Dorian CAUDAL

Tu trouveras plus d'informations sur ce sujet. MirACAAN demande du travail, mais en vaut la peine, car une fois le principe compris, tu peux réaliser un ACAAN vraiment clean et incompréhensible pour le spectateur. Le HPAD peut être un plus, si tu ne veux pas connaître les choix carte / nombre, mais à mon avis cela n'apporte rien. L'effet est ailleurs.

Je suis aussi avec la méthode Elsdon, d'où ma question. Merci pour vos précisions.

Quelle est la différence avec la méthode de résolution de Mark Elsdon publiée dans "Rubik Remembered" ?

RIP Friboudi 1985-2016 :)

Victor et Wanda: "Nous ne sommes pas des magiciens..." Ok... Démo initiale: "Voici un jeu de cartes..." Il m'a tué !

Les CR sont peu élogieux sur le café vert...

Si il y en a "This is the most versatile and ingenious force on the market ! I was deeply fooled by this jewel " Luca Volpe "Why didn't I think of this myself ? This is f***ing awesome ! One of the best mentalism products I've ever seen in a long time" - Pablo Amira

Qui connaît cette méthode de forçage disponible sur le site du pingouin ? From the creative team Thinking Paradox comes this great tool for the mentalist to control spectators’ choices without being detected. The volunteer will be certain he had a free choice, he can even change his mind and his choice is always under your control. You will always know beforehand the the content of the chosen billet. And here’s the best part: the handling is very easy, undetectable, natural… and even you can perform it completely impromptu! You just need a glass, any glass. Of course, every billet is examinable before and after the effect. No switches! It doesn’t matter whether you are a magician or a mentalist, just imagine the different uses of this technique. We will show you three high-impact routines (Prediction, Drawing Duplication and ACAAN), but the possibilities are endless. Please note that instructional video is in Spanish voice with English subtitles.

Gagné !

Si tu as ça sur Windows Phone aussi, dub, je suis preneur

Donc ça signifie beaucoup de routines lues et peu de routines que tu as envie de faire... C'est bien cela que tu voulais dire ?

Le département en rouge, c'est l'Aisne (numéro 2). Donc un truc se transforme "en 2"...

Le lien a déjà été donné un peu plus haut, mais merci quand même. Oups le boulet

Une utilisation extra intéressante de ce gimmick sur le sujet d'aujourd'hui du blog The Jerx. Je ne mets pas le lien. Si vous êtes vraiment intéressés, démmerdez-vous, vous devriez trouver ça facilement. Je suis déjà assez gentil pour vous informer qu'il y a quelqu'un qui donne une idée de génie pour utiliser ce marqueur dans un contexte intelligent et nettement plus accrocheur que "tiens, je dessine une croix sur ma main, et hop, elle voyage dans la tienne..."

Une réflexion intéressante tirée du site jerx sur les effets de type "which hand ?"... En gros, pour les non anglophones, ça dit que si on avait vraiment le pouvoir de détecter la vérité et le mensonge, pourquoi le démontrerions-nous avec un jeu de pièce dans la main, "plot" le moins intéressant du monde ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I played around with the "which hand" type of effect and a liar/truth-teller presentation a lot this past month. It is, I think, an effect magicians appreciate much more than non-magicians. In fact, my layman-mind is so disinterested in this trick it turned me off to "body-language" and "lie-detecting" as a premise at all for the past few years. Think of it this way: The idea here is that you're able to tell when someone is lying based on visual or aural clues. Now imagine you really had that skill. Got it? Okay, now I'm going banish you to live on a mountain cliff where you will subsist only on rainwater and tree moss until you can come up with a less interesting way of demonstrating this skill than determining which hand someone is holding a coin in. You will die on that cliff. We are literally demonstrating a skill in the least interesting way possible. And why? Well, because people have come up with some clever and interesting ways to determine where the coin is and/or if someone is lying or telling the truth. Clever in method. Interesting to the performer. The audience is just a cog in the process that we're using to keep ourselves entertained. First, let's look at a procedural issue with this type of trick. In a lot of these effects the audience is expected to either consistently lie or consistently tell the truth about certain things. I found that people would often get tripped up with yes or no questions if they were supposed to lie all the time. Their life, up until this point, has been about satisfying people with timely and accurate responses to questions. And that's so ingrained in them that -- even when they know they're supposed to lie about everything -- if someone says, "Is the coin in your right hand?" their first instinct is often just to spit out the truth. So I found this happening a lot: Me: Is the coin in your right hand? Them: Yes... [pause] Oh, wait, no! No... it's not. To combat this I would tell them to slow down and take a few seconds to answer the question, but I didn't really like that. I didn't want to seem to be playing any role in how much time they were taking to respond to me. I found that the best way to handle the situation is not to ask yes or no questions in the first place. Instead I would say something like this, "I want you to keep your role in mind [liar or truth-teller] and when you're ready I want you to tell me which hand holds the coin in a manner consistent with your role." They would take a beat and say, for example, "The coin is in my left hand." This is the same as me saying, "Is the coin in your right hand?" and them answering "No." But it has the advantage that nobody ever fucks it up, and it gets the spectator to put the sentence in their own words which gives you more to work with when you "analyze" their response for lies.

ça va il est bien scellé, donc pas de soucis...

Je pense que c'est la bonne réponse..; Dub, tu confirmes ? Une autre, assez difficile

Info de la part de Will tsai (source: magiccafe) On dirait une compétition pour savoir qui a la plus grosse... Aussi digne que la course au dernier iPhone... Hello it's Will Tsai here. ReviewerMaster, not sure where you are getting the clip. Would you be able to keep the video(s) to yourself until the product launches? It'll be super wonderful for all to see everything all at once! Thank you in advance. And for the people who might have recorded my performance with Vapr Watch somewhere in the world, if you could do the same, it'd be much much appreciated. Thank you all. Since quite a few have messaged me from here, I'd share my response all at once. No I am not a part of Lynx Magic. Yes I do have my Vapr Watch coming up. It was meant to come out last Christmas. However the release date was moved to March due to my obsession of adding some really cool features. I am very excited about it! Can't give too much info away at the moment. It's beyond just a smoke watch. For the people who likes options for their investments, you might find this info useful. Best, will

Porter une montre qui ne donne pas l'heure, et devoir appuyer sur un bouton pour déclencher des nuages de fumée en nombre limité, alors qu'avec VapR on peut le faire (quasiment) à l'infini avant de recharger, c'est un comble ! Bonjour l'innovation !

[video:youtube]

2016, année des appareils à fumée, boîtes transparentes à la carte, des livres de Jermay, et des ACAAN ! 2016 sera originale

'Tain... un gimmick pour changer un jeu à 40€ alors qu'il y a des tonnes de méthodes simples qui passent toutes seules On passe !

Réfléxion intéressante menée sur le blog du Jerx So anyway, after hearing my friend's comments I began to get interested in how other regular people (non-magicians) would view some magicians that you and I might be very familiar with, but who they have probably never even heard of. So over the course of the next few weeks I showed some performances of a few different magicians to some friends of mine. I didn't make them sit through a whole DVD I just showed them a couple effects for each performer. It was interesting (and somewhat surprising) and I plan on doing some more of these. David Regal: All found him "enjoyable." Some said he was "sweet." One said he was "the best." Meaning, he does the best magic? "No, he seems the most normal." Although watching a couple of effects on his DVDs left some wondering, "Who are these people," (referring to L&L's audience). Darwin Ortiz: critiques were widely mixed for this magician. Well many believed he "seems to know what he's doing." And one found him to be "incredible," a female said he was "boring." When I told her she was living up to the stereotype of women not liking card tricks she said that Ortiz was "living up to the stereotype of magicians being boring." Eugene Burger: While most people found the magic to be "fine," and one considered him "charmingly effeminate," the overwhelming opinion was that he was "ridiculously condescending." One viewer commented, "I know I'm not retarded, but he made me feel like maybe I am retarded." A nous de tenter l'expérience ? Si on montrait certains extraits de nos "maîtres" à des moldus / famille, etc... qu'en penseraient-ils ?

Non, justement, c'est cela qui le rend performable partout ! Oui, mais peu crédibles, non ? Un ticket de caisse a nécessairement une adresse imprimée dessus ? Je me trompe peut-être mais ça me paraît bizarre...

[video:youtube]